The Ehrenfest paradox vs relativists

In the formulas of his theories of relativity, Einstein used the so-called Lorentz contraction 1 / sqrt (1 – v ^ 2 / c ^ 2), by which any parameter must be multiplied: time, mass, distance, in order to compare these parameters in two “relativistic inertial systems” moving at different speeds. The mathematicians have been wondering with this formula for more than a hundred years, but they are absolutely unable to compare their results with reality, they have such a brain structure, they have formulas above all.

And here is the test of the special theory of relativity by phenomena in the real world.

In 1973, the American physicist Thomas Phips used a rotating disk to test the special theory of relativity using Ehrenfest’s idea. Ehrenfest’s idea was that, since the speed of each element of the circle of a rotating disk is directed tangentially, its circumference should experience “Lorentz contraction”, that is, its size for an external observer should become smaller than that of a stationary disk. Thomas Phipps photographed the disk spinning at a speed of 150 kilometers per second on its edge. The dimensions of Phips’ disc have not changed at all! They made a lot of noise about this in the narrow circles of relativists and, of course … ignored in their usual way. That is, when an observation or experiment does not fit into relativistic theories, it is simply declared a paradox; in this case, not following the nature of the special theory of relativity was called the Ehrenfest paradox.
You can also compare the motion of “relativistic time” at two points of this rotating disk, moving relative to the selected frame of reference with noticeably different, but high speeds. According to the special theory of relativity, these points should be in “different times”. Let us choose the microwave background radiation as a reference frame. The disk moves relative to it with the Earth. It is well known that the orbital speed of the Earth in the Solar System is 30 km / s, the Solar System moves in the Galaxy at a speed of 300 km / s, and the Galaxy moves at a speed of about 600 km / s, in relation to the microwave background radiation. The disk on one side with respect to the microwave background radiation will have a maximum speed of 1080 km / s, and on the other 780 km / s. In this case, the fast side will lag behind the slow side by a nanosecond per second from the slow side. That is, for an outside observer, the fast side should remain in the past, the slow side should go into the future, and the disk should disappear, being lost in the past and future.
But we are observing the entire rotating disk at the same time.

Here is an even higher rotational speed achieved in the experiment.

Scientists from Purdue University have created a system of nanoparticles that rotate at a speed of the order of a billion revolutions per second, which is today a kind of record for the speed of mechanical rotation. (These rotating particles were used to test the theories of “quantum friction” in the “space-time continuum. Naturally, they did not find any” quantum friction “, did not notice that, according to Ehrenfest, they once again refuted the special theory of relativity … rotation speed record.)

In their experiments, scientists used quartz nanoparticles, about a hundred nanometers in size, the shape of which is very reminiscent of the shape of tiny dumbbells. This shape, subject to the rotation of the nanoparticle, ensures that at the slightest disturbance of the balance, it becomes possible to measure very weak forces. These nanoparticles were lifted up in a vacuum using optical tweezers, and after being illuminated with circular polarized light (whose electric field rotates at a certain frequency), the tiny nanodumbbells began to spin at a tremendous speed, making one billion revolutions in one second.

A team of scientists from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zurich) also worked with quartz nanoparticles. However, the original goal pursued by the Swiss scientists was different from the goal of the American scientists. “We did this in order to find out the limits of our own capabilities,” says Rene Reimann, a scientist at ETH Zurich. “It was only when we got the high rotation speed and measured it that we started thinking about the practical application of our discoveries. ”Nanoparticles can rotate at such a high speed due to the fact that in a vacuum there are no air atoms that create friction,” says Rene Reinmann, “Theoretically, you can accelerate a particle to such a speed that the forces holding the atoms are less than centrifugal forces , and the particle will cease to exist, scattering into separate atoms. But in order to get to this limit, we first need to define and study how polarized light transfers its torque to the particle. “

And here are the observations:

Scientists from Finland have observed two related objects, which they call “black

holes “located at a distance of 3.6 billion light years. The smaller object revolves around the larger one with a 12-year orbital period and, periodically passing through the accretion disk, produces a flash.
By predicting the next flash and observing it with the Swift telescope, scientists were able to figure out the rotation speed of this object with maximum accuracy. This speed was 100,000 km / s. But one side of this rotating object rotates in the direction of its orbital motion, and the other against this direction. The difference in the relativistic motion of “time” for the two sides of this object should be for an external observer, according to relativist formulas, not less than a second for every 10 seconds of his time. The object must also be torn between the past and the future …
This could not have been overlooked …
But the object is observed intact.

Now let us consider the application of the general theory of relativity to natural phenomena.
Being at different heights on our Earth, according to relativistic formulas, we are also in zones with different speeds of movement in time, and inevitably through any, even the most insignificant time, we must find ourselves in different times. As if the coincidence with the conclusions of general relativity is demonstrated by the clocks of the GPS satellite system, which move faster where the “space curvature tensor” is less, that is, in orbit. General relativity predicts for GPS satellites that the atomic clock at orbital altitudes of GPS satellites is faster by about 45,900 ns / day. Two-way communication between objects located at different times is impossible, but we communicate easily. The clocks on the satellites of the GPS system really go faster, but for some reason they do not go into the future in the “space-time continuum”, but are in the same time with us. So, we must assume that the reason for the difference in the course of the GPS system clocks on the Earth’s surface and in orbit is not in the formulas of the general theory of relativity, but in the fact that the atoms of these clocks on Earth and in orbit have slightly different properties due to the different content of matter that determines gravity …

(But nature, what a fool she is, does not understand the “beauty” of relativistic formulas and does not want to follow them.)

Оставить комментарий

Ваш адрес email не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *

Solve : *
16 ⁄ 2 =