About the “physical vacuum” and Einstein’s theory …

In modern official theoretical quantum physics and cosmology since the twenties of the XX century, a kind of “physical vacuum” appears. This environment, like any environment, then in the form of a classical “ether”, in 1905 was rejected by Einstein’s special theory of relativity.
The difference between different versions of the “physical vacuum” from the “ether” is that the etherists invented and are inventing all the different structures of the structural elements of that very “ether”, and the adherents of the “physical vacuum” declare that this child of theirs is the lowest energetic state of matter, while it contains some quantized fields, which are absolutely unknown what, but having zero oscillations of this unknown what, in addition, in this “physical vacuum” in the absence of real particles, they are still there, but in a “virtual” form.
The idea of ​​a “physical vacuum” sanctioned complete arbitrariness in theoretical physics, allowing everything from the “puffing out” of the Higgs bosons by particles of matter and the possibility of creating “universes”, for example, in colliders, to the conclusion that: “The universe as a system is not only self-organized, but alive, and even reasonable due to the presence of an active element (vacuum) in it, capable of functioning in the mode peculiar to the Reason. “
Whether this combination of aether-vacuum theories and theories of relativism is a paradox or a proof of the futility of all theoretical constructions of theoretical physicists is difficult to say, but the fact that theoretical physicists turn a blind eye to the absolute incompatibility of the ideas of relativism with the presence of any medium should mean, most likely, deliberate construction of false theories by them.
The reason for the incompatibility of the ideas of relativism with the “physical vacuum” in any form is that any medium in which any objects in the world move is a priority basic frame of reference for their speed. Einstein, on the other hand, built his theories on the postulate of the absence of a priority frame of reference. According to Einstein, all frames of reference are invariant (equivalent). Einstein’s vacuum is completely empty.
In contrast to this, in the “physical vacuum” for theorists there is even “quantum friction” of “virtual particles” on moving objects, there is an energetic particle knocking out the “Higgs boson” from this very “physical vacuum”, and it is “possible” only when a strictly defined speed is reached of this particle RELATIVE TO THIS FIXED “PHYSICAL VACUUM”. That is, the “physical vacuum” UNDERSTANDING EINSTEIN, UNCONDITIONALLY, must be an absolute reference frame for the velocities of all objects in the world. The movement of virtual particles by the definition of “physical vacuum” is impossible, because they have zero energy. When “energy is transferred to a virtual particle” by a particle that is not virtual, for example, in the processes that supposedly occur in a collider when receiving particles, including the famous “boson, or Higgs, or God”, the virtual particle becomes not virtual! This “happens” in a strictly localized place in the infinite mass of “physical vacuum”! From the state of zero velocity relative to the “physical vacuum” this particle begins to move, absolute only in relation to the “physical vacuum”, and in comparison with other objects – only relative.
Well, theorists – adherents of the “physical vacuum”, declare that you spit on Einstein, and vice versa adherents of Einstein’s theories, finally study his work and declare that theorists of quantum mechanics are not physicists at all!

Оставить комментарий

Ваш адрес email не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *

Solve : *
21 + 22 =