The mass of the Earth and with the help of it the masses of any celestial bodies are incorrectly determined using Newton’s formula, according to theoreticians, as if reflecting the law of universal gravitation.
The mass of the Earth is, as it were, determined by the gravimetric method.
F = gMm / r ^ 2, where F is the interaction force, g is the gravitational constant, M and m are the masses of interacting bodies, r is the distance between them.
In Newton’s formula, the masses of two bodies bound by gravity are multiplied. How can you understand what is the value obtained as a result of this multiplication? Some crazy flat square mass !? But then this delusional value is divided by another delusional value, obtained by squaring the distance between the bodies, and this delusional value is clearly not taken as some strange area
And the masses of the planets of the solar system and the sun were calculated according to Kepler’s third law.
The constant of gravitation f was determined from the experiments of Cavendish, but many attempts to determine this constant gave not a refinement of it, but a large scatter of its values.
With the currently accepted values of g, R and f, the formula supposedly gives the mass of the Earth 6 by 10 in 24
Knowing the mass of the Earth and its volume, how can you find the average density of the Earth. It turns out to be 5.52 g / cm3
Kepler’s third law seems to allow one to determine the relationship between the mass of the Sun and the mass of the planet.
Knowing the mass of the Sun and the ratio of this mass to the mass of any other planet that has a satellite, we determined the mass of this planet.
But that’s bad luck! The masses of the planets and their sizes determined … But their densities, for some unknown reason, turned out to be less and less than that of the Earth:
The dimensions of the Earth’s orbit, determined by Newton’s formula, do not coincide with those dimensions that are obtained from the observation of the passage of photons between the points of the Earth’s orbit indicated in the diagram K95 and L8.
From observing the passage of light through the points indicated above, the radius of the Earth’s orbit should be at least 200,000,000 kilometers …
The parameters of the orbit of Venus, obtained by direct measurement and calculation, do not coincide.
Venus, the morning and evening star of the ancient myth-makers, sometimes rises or sets with a difference of about 3 hours from the Sun. This results in an angle of about 48 degrees between the directions of the Sun and Venus.
It is easy to calculate the radius of the orbit of Venus from these data, if we assume that the distance from the Earth to the Sun, or the radius of the Earth’s orbit, is 150,000,000 kilometers, for this it is necessary to divide the value of the radius of the earth’s orbit by the tangent of an angle of 48 degrees equal to 1.110613. It turns out that the radius of the orbit of Venus is about 135,000,000 … Strange, but the reference data is 108,000,000 kilometers.
Distances in Space, also determined from the dimensions of the Earth’s orbit, also raise serious doubts. And the masses of space objects, calculated by the above formulas, are so inadequate that cosmologists had to invent an additional mass in the form of “dark matter” for a fantastic “mathematical universe”.